Quick tips — 5–5 draw
They played a narrow diamond: two strikers, packed middle, and fullbacks bombing on. The wings behind those fullbacks were wide open, but you barely used them.
Your edge: Get your striker living in the box and hit their empty flanks fast. They made twice as many shots as you, so stop letting them walk through the middle.
Do this
- Switch your ST to Poacher on Attack, so there's always someone in the box to finish your breaks.
- Change one CAM to Playmaker on Balanced so she drops back and helps your lone CM against their crowded midfield.
- Set Build-Up Style to Counter and send the ball wide early to your RM, into the space their fullbacks leave behind.
You're doing well
You scored 5 from only 9 shots. When you break, you're deadly. 🎯
Tactical report: 5–5 draw
Headline: A 5–5 draw that flatters your side's shape. You were clinical: 5 goals from 9 shots and 2.64 xG. The opponent's 4-1-2-1-2 (2) diamond still out-created you with 19 shots, 5.04 xG and 7 corners to 0, and your keeper made 8 saves. Your 4-5-1 sat in a deep but vertically stretched block. Your attack reached the final third only in short bursts and almost never had bodies in the box.
1. Data quality
- 10,256 samples (7,056 in play), radar present 68.8% (moderate), ball detected 94.9%, ID stability 82.1%, gate passed. Moderate confidence: team-level reads are solid.
- Per-player movement isn't attributed to named players yet, so this report reads the team as a whole.
- The squad file was provided and valid: 4-5-1, plan "Div10" (active, formation match), 11/11 roles applied. The roles and focuses below are your real tactic.
- Stats come from the Match Summary screen (full time, 93:03, not ended early): possession 52–48, passes 126–129, pass accuracy 84%–87%, shots 9–19, xG 2.64–5.04, interceptions 9–16.
2. Controlled team (4-5-1)
Out of possession:
- Low block. The back line averaged ~21 m from your own goal, deeper than the opponent's ~30 m.
- Stretched vertically. The block was ~55 m long and ~39 m wide, a hull of ~1,350 m² against the opponent's ~920 m². The gap between your back four and the two CAMs + False 9 is the main structural problem.
- Passive. Pressing was low (~0.6 defenders near the ball) and marking fairly loose (~9 m to the nearest man).
- Recovery running went through the middle. Most recovery sprints came from the spine of the team rather than the flanks, which fits a diamond running at the middle.
- This is a coherent "sit and counter" shape, but it gave away too much territory. The opponent made 78 final-third entries to your 6.
In possession:
- Short attacks. 36 attacking spells averaging ~5 s (opponent: ~17 s). Width was reasonable at ~45 m.
- Almost no box presence. Box occupation was very low (~0.14 players on average).
- Half your outfielders stayed behind the ball (~5 in your own half during attacks).
- Forward runs came from the front three. The wide midfielders added some, and the back line made essentially none.
Passing lanes (open options, geometric only, not passes attempted or completed):
- Your options pointed mostly into the halfspaces (~56%), then central (~33%). Only ~11% pointed to the wings.
- Short lanes were rarely blocked (low congestion, ~0.15). Breadth of options was decent (~7.3 distinct open receivers per sample), slightly below the opponent's ~7.8.
- Hubs: your options built through the middle of the pitch, from the back line into central midfield, rather than down the flanks.
- The ball was available between the lines. The problem was the lack of runners arriving in the box, not a crowded pitch.
- Open lanes swung widely between spells, from ~7 to ~26 per spell. There was no clear improvement across the clip.
3. Opponent — 4-1-2-1-2 (2) (from the performance screen)
- Narrow diamond: LS/RS, CAM, LCM/RCM, CDM, flat back four.
- Shape and lanes match the formation. Their open options pointed ~53% central and ~44% halfspace, and only ~3% to the wing.
- Their options built through the middle. Their circulation ran through the centre of the diamond, not the flanks.
- Width came from the fullbacks. In attack their back line pushed up wide, toward halfway on the flanks.
- Heavy box traffic. Box occupation was ~1.26 players, up to 8 at once, and their front line made far more forward runs than yours.
- Compact out of possession. Hull ~920 m², length ~40 m, slightly more pressing (~0.76) than you.
- What to exploit:
- With no natural wide midfielders and fullbacks pushed on, the space behind their fullbacks is the obvious outlet. Your wide men are the ones free to use it.
- They also over-committed centrally, which explains why you were so efficient on the counter (5 goals from 2.64 xG).
- What cost you was the central overload: a diamond plus a CAM against your lone Box-To-Box.
4. Shape vs your tactic
- The front three is set up to arrive in the box, but nobody did. You set a False 9 at ST with two Shadow Strikers (Attack) behind, a set-up built for the CAMs to run beyond a dropping striker. The forward runs did come from that front three, yet box occupation stayed at ~0.14 players: the shape got runners moving, not arriving.
- The wide roles ask for attack, but the flanks stayed shut. Both wide midfielders are on Winger (Attack), which asks for high, wide positions. The team instead defended in a deep, stretched block, and only ~11% of your open options pointed to the wings.
- The rest broadly held its configured shape: a lone Box-To-Box CM screening a flat back four in a low block.
5. Top adjustments
- Commit your ST slot to the box. Switch the ST from False 9 to Poacher (Attack) or Advanced Forward (Attack). A False 9 drops off to link play, and you averaged barely one-seventh of a player in the box.
- Protect the middle against the diamond. Your 4-5-1 has one CM (Box-To-Box) against their three central midfielders plus a CAM, and both your CAMs are Shadow Strikers on Attack.
- Move one CAM to Playmaker (Balanced) so that slot drops in and shortens the ~55 m gap between your lines.
- Alternatively, set your CM to Box-To-Box (Ball-Winning).
- Go direct into their empty flanks. Set Build-Up Style to Counter. Your spells were already short, and the space behind their pushed-on fullbacks is where your wide midfielders can hurt them. Look to release the wing early rather than recycling into the congested halfspace.
- If you want sustained pressure instead, a fullback on Wingback (Support) adds the overlap: your back line made virtually no forward runs.
Passing Lanes is part of CXI Pro: an experimental report on where your open passing options were during the match (central, half-space or wing). About Pro →
ExperimentalPassing Lanes reads open options from the radar, which can miss a defender marking tightly. Use it as a guide to where your options tended to be, not as a verdict on single passes.
Passing Lanes: 5–5 draw
Radar was present about 69% of the time. Open lanes here mean options available, not passes played.
1. Your passing infrastructure
- Best channel: the halfspaces. Over half your open options (~56%) pointed there, about a third went central, and the wings were close to empty (~11%). Against a narrow diamond this is a missed opportunity. Their shape left the flanks free, but the wing lanes rarely opened for you.
- Main hub: the middle of the pitch. Your options built through the centre of the team, from the back line into central midfield, rather than down the flanks.
- The lanes weren't crowded. Opponents rarely blocked your short options, and you usually had a good spread of open teammates to pick from. The problem wasn't space. It was the lack of runners arriving late into the box to receive.
- Your spells were short and uneven. Some attacks had plenty of open options and others very few, with no steady improvement across the clip. That fits quick breaks rather than sustained possession.
Suggested passing focus: Play the halfspace runner a beat earlier, and when the middle clogs, switch to the free flank. Two changes help:
- Set Build-Up Style to Counter so those balls get played sooner.
- Put the ST on Poacher (Attack) so there's always a target running in behind.